Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
If there is anything in this world that anybody living with diabetes should know, it is blood glucose monitoring. Many of diabetes sufferers seem to check their blood glucose levels but their main problem lies in comprehending what the data derived from such religious act really meant and the effect of such data on their day-to-day living.

One of such problem is that blood glucose levels constantly fluctuate and are influenced by many factors. The other part of the problem is that no two people are alike. A blood glucose reading of 158 mg/dl in two different people might have two different explanations.


Talking of already- available information, people are aware of the fact that their bodies need glucose to fuel their activities and that certain foods or large quantities of almost any food will raise blood glucose. The body’s conversion is an uniquely balanced intricate enzyme- driven and energy- producing process.

Before any blood glucose reading has meaning, you need to know what you’re aiming for. Target goals for blood glucose set by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) are 90–130 mg/dl before a meal and less than 180 mg/dl two hours after the start of a meal. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) has defined stricter blood glucose target goals of less than 110 mg/dl before a meal and less than 140 mg/dl two hours after the start of a meal. Ask your health-care provider whether you should use the ADA or the AACE targets as your goal. Both guidelines are based on evidence showing the blood glucose readings that are needed to prevent the complications of diabetes.
The blood glucose goal is to aim for a target range, not an exact number each time. Before-meal blood glucose readings of 101 mg/dl, 114 mg/dl, 126 mg/dl, and 97 mg/dl may look like they are up and down, but they’re all within the target range defined by the ADA.


How often should I check?
Most people check their blood glucose level once a day, first thing in the morning. It’s a common time to check because it’s easy: You get up, check your blood glucose, take your medicines, and eat breakfast. Then you’re done with your diabetes for the day and don’t have to think about it anymore.

The problem with this routine is that it only tells you about your blood glucose pattern before breakfast. You don’t learn what is happening after meals or later in the day. To find meaningful patterns at other times of the day, you have to check at other times of day.
One option for finding more patterns is to check your blood glucose four times per day three days per week. Checking before breakfast, two hours after breakfast, before dinner, and two hours after dinner three times per week for a few weeks will help you identify your patterns throughout the day.

Try to make blood glucose monitoring a useful tool by checking your blood glucose at times that serve you. Blood glucose monitoring should help you make a decision, give you feedback about a decision, and help you learn about your usual patterns.

You also need to consider the cost of the test strips. For those who do not take insulin, Medicare pays for one strip per day, so you want to put those strips to good use. Instead of just checking before breakfast every morning, you might decide to check before and after breakfast on Monday, before and after lunch on Wednesday, and before and after dinner on Saturday. If you take insulin, Medicare and most health insurance plans will pay for the number of strips written by your health-care provider on the prescription.

There are many ways to keep track of your blood glucose readings so that you can evaluate the patterns. You can use a logbook in which you write down the readings along with any comments (such as what you had for lunch or how stressed you were feeling). Depending on what meter you use, you may be able to use computer software that displays the contents of your meter memory in graphic forms. Or you could use a meter with an electronic logbook, such as the OneTouch UltraSmart, Accu-Chek Complete, or FreeStyle Tracker.

22
Vote
   


The American Diabetes Association

According to the MSNBC, new government estimates show that nearly 24 million people in the United States have diabetes, an increase of more than 3 million in two years.

This means that nearly 8 percent of the U.S. population has diabetes, mostly the type-2 diabetes linked with obesity, poor diet and a lack of exercise, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Tuesday.

The estimates, based on 2007 data, also show that 57 million people have pre-diabetes, a condition that puts people at increased risk for diabetes. And up to 25 percent of people with diabetes do not know they have it, the CDC said — down from 30 percent two years ago.

lmost 25 percent of the population 60 years and older had diabetes in 2007, the CDC found.

The highest rates are among Native Americans and Alaska Natives, with 16.5 percent affected. Close to 12 percent of blacks and 10 percent of Hispanics have diabetes, but just 7.5 percent of Asian Americans and 6.6 percent of whites.
30
Vote
   


Source: MSNBC.com

Karen Collins, R.D.
Limit consumption of energy-dense foods. That’s the advice from the latest international report on diet and cancer published by the American Institute for Cancer Research. The recommendation — aimed at promoting weight control — was included in the cancer-focused report because of the convincing link between overweight and several types of cancer.

The “energy-dense food” category referenced in the report includes foods that are concentrated in calories, usually because they are high in fat, processed carbohydrates and/or added sugar. Note, however, that some energy-dense foods — namely, nuts and seeds — are relatively unprocessed and supply many beneficial nutrients. These foods are not linked to weight gain when consumed moderately as part of a healthy diet.

Most Americans, however, are choosing the other kinds of energy-dense foods — those that the research links to an increased chance of weight gain, overweight and obesity. One popular consumer solution: Choosing reduced-fat or fat-free forms of the same foods. But these lower-fat options aren’t always lower in calories, particularly when they are consumed in jumbo portions

A typical blueberry muffin purchased before the “super-sizing” of America’s food supply would have measured less than three inches in diameter and might have contained about 250 calories. Today, however, many bakeries and coffee shops serve muffins with twice the calories of the old-fashioned size. Even if a consumer chooses a low fat version (potentially dropping the fat content from 20 grams down to 2 grams), the muffin would still likely contain about 290 to 340 calories. In other words, the low fat, super-sized muffin is still higher in calories than the smaller, full-fat version. (Note that although low-fat muffins are no longer high-fat foods, their high-sugar content — up to eight teaspoons of sugar per muffin – keeps these foods in the energy-dense category.)

Reduced-fat versions of foods that start off as super-rich products can also be misleading. For example, a one-cup portion of conventional vanilla ice cream will cost you roughly 270 calories. Light versions, which trim the fat from 14 grams to 3 to 5 grams, can drop the calories to about 210 for the same portion size. However, decadent gourmet ice creams can contain from 480 to 580 calories per cup of vanilla ice cream. The light version of these products only reduces fat to the level of the conventional “full fat” ice cream. Because sugar content remains high, the 350 to 400 calories in gourmet light ice cream are often substantially higher than the regular version of conventional varieties.

Reduced-fat peanut butter is another example. Although lower in fat than regular peanut butter, with added sugar, starches and/or soy protein, the calories remain the same.

Not to discount all reduced-fat or low fat versions of foods — many do save calories. When purchasing cheese, milk and meat, for example, choosing the lower-fat products means less cholesterol-raising saturated fat and fewer calories. And if you just can’t live with fat-free cheese, even saving 20 calories per ounce with reduced-fat cheese can still be worthwhile.

The bottom line: By substituting a few lower-fat versions for the higher-fat foods you eat frequently, you can save calories, which can add up to make weight control easier. The key is to make those switches without simultaneously doubling your portion size or choosing the “light” version of a product richer than something you would normally choose.
21
Vote
   


Going through some websites at whcih I usually get the latest information on the health sector,. One of such reported a study that suggests that individuals that want to control their weight should heavy breakfasts. The recommendation isi otherwise known as "the big breakfast diet". The researchers said that it controls appetite and satisfies cravings for sweets and starches. Another reason given is that healthier than popular low-carb diets because it allows people to eat more fiber- and vitamin-rich fruit. The leader of the study, Dr. Daniela Jakubowicz, of the Hospital de Clinicas in Caracas, Venezuela, claimed that she's successfully used this diet in her patients for more than 15 years. Your text goes here
30
Vote
   


Believe This: Fats are healthy

June 19th 2008 15:29
Fats
Doughnuts: Rich source of fats

Many people see fats as potential cause of obesity, artherosclerosis, hypertension, heart failure, cancer and myriads of terminal ailments. Many individuals have resolve to keep away from fatty foods as far as possible while those that take fats see them as necessary poisons that they’ve become accustomed to, forming a vital part of their day-to-day living. In essence, fats and physiological contretemps are said to have close ties of consanguinity. But, fats are not all about being a potential minefield for those that lack the full compos mentis over what they ingest. This is an exposition of the advantages embedded in adequate fat intake.

[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


The world health organization
The World Health Organization


Being a final year medical science student is something that I am so happy about. Medicine has always been a field that I want to be part of and I thank God today that I am en route my destination. Being healthy is not an luxury but the right of every individual on the earth hence the need for the relevant agencies involved in the regulation of global health not to rest on their oars until the best is achieved. According to the WHO, "Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity


[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


More Posts
6 Posts
6 Posts dating from June 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Adepoju Paul Olusegun's Blogs

201 Vote(s)
1 Comment(s)
6 Post(s)
110 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
646 Vote(s)
18 Comment(s)
14 Post(s)
118 Vote(s)
2 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]